“FLOW is the mental state of operation in which a person in an activity is fully immersed in a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and success in the process of the activity.“
It is the intersection of high skill level and high challenge level.
We all know the feeling of being in the flow – athletes call it the zone, sometimes we experience it at work, in a presentation, in class, where you are just ON.
Why is this important? Because recruiting season is starting (yes, in the first full week of school, there was already a recruiting networking event for 2nd year MBA students) and this is a time fraught with anxiety, much frenetic rushing about as we try to figure out what to do after leaving the warm cocoon of HBS.
We stop thinking about being in the Flow, and start worrying about landing an interview, getting a job, thinking about LIFE with a capital “L”.
Now I know there are two, maybe more schools of thought about work – live to work or work to live, and I’m probably much more in the former camp – I want to like what I’m doing, and who I’m working with. That doesn’t seem like a big insight – but I think it’s taken a number of jobs and lots of conversations to figure out what kinds of work/challenges make me excited, keep me engaged, and encourage me to give my best everyday. I enjoy being surrounded by people who love what they’re doing – who aren’t just showing up to collect a paycheck, and who are passionate about the things they do everyday.
There is a lot of temptation to put off the things you love, to be sensible and do the right, safe thing – after all, we’ve been taught to assess the risks and rewards of our decisions, but often, we look too narrowly at compensation and fail to value the psychic rewards of being truly engaged and energized by our work. We did a case on Lehman’s research department in the 1990s, where analysts stayed at Lehman, were paid less than the competition (GS, ML) and outperformed them on II rankings. They called it the “Rivkin discount”, what people were willing to take to work for Jack Rivkin and be part of the team. He managed to build a team that was able to deliver results while having fun, even within a traditional stodgy firm like Lehman. Perhaps there are two messages – people are ok being paid less if you give them more than just money. If all you offer is money, you’d better be offering more than the competition.
This brings us to AMP – Daniel Pink’s work on what intrinsically motivates people: Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose.
Autonomy: People want to have control over their work.
Mastery: People want to get better at what they do.
Purpose: People want to be part of something that is bigger than they are.
When you take these three things away from people, you better have a hell of a lot of extrinsic/monetary compensation/fear to drive performance. Recipe for unhappy employees – Remove choice, don’t give them feedback, and make the work they do seem utterly meaningless. This is what people gripe about when they talk about “the Man”, “being a cog/suit/number”. Sound familiar?
So as I sign up for info sessions and coffee chats, I have to keep asking myself if these potential employers are going to offer me the chance to be in the FLOW, to exercise autonomy, to provide constructive feedback, and most importantly, the chance to believe in the enterprise and what we are trying to accomplish together.
I see many of these characteristics in startups, which are autonomous by default since there’s always too much work for anyone to really have time to supervise you, and where if you don’t master what you’re doing, you will be killed by the market, and where there is a built in purpose as you’re part of a team that’s trying to survive.
I’m curious about how to retain this sense of shared purpose as organizations scale and mature. I know there must be large companies who have accomplished this. Anyone know of companies that have done this particularly well over a sustained period of time?